Summary
- The A900, on the other hand, has a 24-85mm zoom lens, which is less versatile but offers a wider aperture range (f/2.
- The A900, however, has a more advanced feature set, including a built-in viewfinder, hot shoe for external flash, and support for RAW format.
- The S9900 is a great choice for budget-conscious photographers seeking a compact and versatile camera.
The realm of compact cameras is vast, with Nikon’s S9900 and A900 standing out as two formidable contenders. Both cameras offer an array of features and capabilities, making it crucial to delve into their distinctions to determine the best fit for your photographic needs. This comprehensive comparison pits the Nikon S9900 vs A900, highlighting their strengths, weaknesses, and ultimate value proposition.
Size and Design
The Nikon S9900 is a compact and lightweight camera, measuring 3.7 x 2.5 x 1.1 inches and weighing 7.1 ounces. Its sleek, metallic body exudes a premium feel, while the A900 is slightly larger and heavier, measuring 4.1 x 2.6 x 1.3 inches and weighing 8.5 ounces. However, the A900’s larger size accommodates a more comfortable grip.
Image Quality
Both cameras feature a 16-megapixel CMOS sensor, but the A900’s sensor is larger, resulting in better low-light performance and reduced noise. The A900 also boasts a wider ISO range (80-6400) compared to the S9900’s 125-3200. This gives the A900 an edge in capturing sharp and detailed images in challenging lighting conditions.
Lens
The S9900 features a 25-750mm zoom lens, providing a versatile range for capturing wide-angle shots to distant subjects. The A900, on the other hand, has a 24-85mm zoom lens, which is less versatile but offers a wider aperture range (f/2.8-5.6) compared to the S9900’s f/3.5-6.5. This wider aperture allows for better background blur and low-light photography.
Features
The S9900 offers a range of features, including a built-in flash, self-timer, and various scene modes. The A900, however, has a more advanced feature set, including a built-in viewfinder, hot shoe for external flash, and support for RAW format. It also features a tilt-screen display, providing greater flexibility for shooting from various angles.
Performance
Both cameras offer fast autofocus and continuous shooting speeds. However, the A900 has a slight edge in autofocus speed, especially in low-light conditions. In terms of continuous shooting, the S9900 can capture up to 7 frames per second, while the A900 can capture up to 6 frames per second.
Battery Life
The S9900 uses AA batteries, while the A900 uses a rechargeable lithium-ion battery. The S9900’s battery life is dependent on the type of batteries used, but it generally provides around 230 shots per charge. The A900’s rechargeable battery offers around 310 shots per charge.
Verdict: The Ultimate Choice
The Nikon S9900 and A900 are both capable compact cameras, but each caters to different needs. The S9900 is a great choice for budget-conscious photographers seeking a compact and versatile camera. The A900 is better suited for those who prioritize image quality, advanced features, and a comfortable grip. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual preferences and photographic goals.
Answers to Your Most Common Questions
Q: Which camera has better image stabilization?
A: Both cameras have image stabilization, but the A900 has a more advanced system that provides better stabilization, especially for video.
Q: Can either camera shoot in RAW format?
A: Only the A900 supports RAW format, which gives you greater control over post-processing.
Q: Which camera is better for low-light photography?
A: The A900 has a larger sensor and wider ISO range, making it better suited for low-light conditions.
Q: Can I use external lenses with either camera?
A: Neither camera has interchangeable lenses.
Q: Which camera has a longer battery life?
A: The A900 has a longer battery life, with around 310 shots per charge compared to the S9900’s 230 shots.